top of page

The problem with tax avoidance...

Tax avoidance dramatically reduces the amount of money available to the government to spend on public services like schools, hospitals and police officers. Despite avoidance being completely legal, to the ordinary tax paying citizen it seems completely unfair that major companies such as those listed on this database are allowed to use their big pockets to dodge their way out of paying as much tax as they should. HMRC estimate the tax gap to be somewhere around the £32 billion mark, with £5-10 billion of that caused directly by big business tax avoidance. Many disagree with HMRC's figures and gauge the tax gap to be even higher; at £120 billion, £95 billion of which is related to tax avoidance and evasion. To give you an idea of how significant these figures are, if that £120 billion were collected by HMRC it would completely wipe out the United Kingdom's national deficit and put the economy back on an even keel.

Why



Tax avoidance is certainly not a new phenomenon. Exploiting loopholes in tax laws to gain a competitive edge has always been part of big business strategy. But over the past few decades the situation has been amplified by various factors, most prominently globalisation and digitisation.

The opening up of world trade and the emergence of a 'global marketplace' has certainly brought us many benefits (strawberries in the winter!) but it has also let loose hordes of multinational companies and disreputable accountants seeking to cut themselves a bigger slice of the cake. It's difficult to blame corporations for using tax laws to gain an unfair advantage - corporations are driven to secure a better deal for their shareholders by beating the competition and increasing their profit margins. Using the differences between countries' tax laws is a completely legal way of achieving this goal.



So the onus lies with government, both our own and those across the world, to adjust tax laws to curtail the corporations and bring about a fairer distribution of wealth. The reason the current globo-economic culture - which generally promotes large-scale tax avoidance - is accepted is because governments are too fearful of scaring away investment from big companies. The risk of losing the mega trade of a multinational is, for most governments, too high and as a result the fair taxation of society suffers.

How



It's difficult to understand how not paying the amount of tax that you owe could possibly be legal. If an ordinary citizen attempted to avoid paying their fair share then we would expect them to be hunted down by the tax man and told to either pay up or pay a visit to the local prison. Yet it is standard practice for multinational companies to aggressively avoid paying the tax that they owe. And they pretty much always get away with it. According to a recent PAC report on tax avoidance the number of court cases that HMRC wins against corporate tax dodgers is "tiny" in comparison to the number of enquiries it makes.



It does not help that a whole business has sprung up around tax avoidance. Big accountancy firms and private tax specialists are constantly analysing the tax system, looking for loopholes that they can exploit in their corporate clients' favour. Unsurprisingly, these 'tax planners' are paid handsomely for their services whilst public finances suffer.  



The avoidance schemes that the private tax experts are creating and selling on to big companies are infuriatingly and purposefully complex. Every year, the government introduces new law to close tax loopholes and shut down avoidance schemes but the accountancy firms keep coming up with novel tactics that enable them to carry on dodging. It's been called a "game of cat and mouse" and a competition that corporate tax dodgers are comfortably "winning".

Consequences



The consequences of tax avoidance are profound. It's no secret that we're living in a time of austerity here in the UK; cuts are biting, the economy is flatlining and shops are closing down.

Yet as the figures above show, clamping down on corporate tax avoidance could put a significant dent in the UK's deficit, providing much needed funding for the country's public services. Instead of cutting these vital services, the government could instead use the higher tax revenues to improve them and consequently improve UK society.

Local businesses also suffer as a consequence of corporate tax avoidance. Whilst companies who operate in several countries are able to shift profits out of the UK and into lower tax regimes, purely domestic companies are denied this luxury. It is also often beyond small-scale businesses to be able to afford the hefty fees charged by accountancy firms for their tax planning services. This makes it very difficult for domestic companies to compete with their tax dodging multinational rivals. With their reduced tax bills, multinational companies are in a position to lower their prices on the high street, safe in the knowledge that they cannot be matched by their smaller competitors. This draws cash-strapped consumers away from the 'pricey' local businesses, pushing the small companies into a vicious cycle that further reduces their profitability, up until they are eventually forced to close down.


 

Corporate psychology

One of the most peculiar aspects of corporate tax avoidance is the psychology of its promoters. Whilst the practice is completely legal, many will find it very difficult to morally justify. Just as tax-paying citizens benefit from public services like the NHS, so do businesses who benefit from the UK infrastructure that allows them to operate and turn a profit. As such, they too should pay their fair share. To understand how rogue accountancy firms and multinational companies could possibly vindicate their seemingly immoral tax avoidance schemes, Tax Dodgers Database talked to Tim Worstall, economics blogger and vocal critic of anti tax avoidance campaigners.

TDDB: Do you feel that the issue of tax avoidance has been misconstrued in the mainstream media?

TW: Yes. There isn't in fact anything called "tax avoidance". There is obeying the tax law and there is not obeying the tax law. We also have a system to decide which is which: the law courts. All so called "tax avoidance" collapses down, once it's been examined by the courts, into either tax evasion or obeying the law. There are no other outcomes.



TDDB: Do you feel Margaret Hodge is a fit and proper person to lead the PAC inquiry into big companies' tax avoidance schemes?



TW: She's certainly not informed enough no. I did a TV interview (Sky) with her on the point and when I pointed out that much of the Vodafone/Starbucks/Amazon stuff was all about EU law, all of which the companies were obeying scrupulously, she just said she "didn't agree". ​And quite how anyone with a family trust to protect shares in the family corporation from inheritance tax has the chutzpah to critique others for simply obeying the law as it is written I'm really not sure.

over their heads and three squares a day. And yes, despite that 1% getting ever richer, it really is true that this fall in poverty is so large that global inequality is falling. So if "fairer" is what concerns you perhaps arguing for more of what we're already doing would be a good idea?
 

TDDB: Do you think it fair, in a time of austerity, for multinational companies to use their financial clout to avoid paying as much tax as individual countries' governments would like them to?


TW: Eh? What financial clout? The only "clout" an MNC has is to say "Your taxes are too high so we'll not do business here". Thus they go elsewhere. Also worth noting that corporations, whether MNC or purely domestic, never actually bear the burden of taxes. That's always the shareholders or the workers. A better system would be to abolish corporation tax altogether and simply tax people on their incomes.


TDDB: Should corporations be more transparent about their tax affairs?


TW: No. Why give the crooks in Parliament more information about what to steal?

TDDB: What is your opinion on EU/global tax laws? Should/can be altered to bring about a fairer redistribution of wealth?



TW: Given that almost nowhere taxes wealth I can't see that tax is going to redistribute wealth. Income perhaps, but not wealth. And it's worth noting that global income inequality is actually falling. It's this globalisation thing: we're in the middle of the largest reduction in poverty in the history of our species. Hundreds of millions, billions, are climbing up out of that destitution that has been mankind's historical lot into the petit bourgeois pleasures of a change of clothes, a roof 

Tim Worstall blogs for Forbes magazine and is a fellow of the Adam Smith Institute

A global issue

It's not just first world economies who lose out to the tax dodgers. In the video below,  Al Jazzeera discuss the impact corporate tax avoidance is having in the developing world.

Tax flash

© 2014 Tax Dodgers Database.

bottom of page